The much-anticipated federal legal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs officially commenced with the opening statements delivered on Monday morning, immediately following the final jury pool selection. We are diving into the details regarding the 12 jury members and 6 alternates chosen for this high-profile case, providing insights into their backgrounds and potential biases.

The jury is composed of 8 men and 4 women, while the alternates include 4 men and 2 women. Each juror is identified only by number to maintain their anonymity throughout the proceedings. Notably, the jurors are not sequestered, meaning they will return home each night with strict instructions to refrain from consuming any news coverage related to the trial and to avoid discussing the case with outside parties. This arrangement aims to ensure that their judgment remains impartial and unaffected by external influences.

During last week’s jury selection, insightful details about each juror emerged through their questioning on the stand, alongside the questionnaires they completed. This process provided a glimpse into their backgrounds, beliefs, and potential biases that could influence their decision-making in the high-stakes trial.

Juror 2 is a 69-year-old single white man without children, working as a massage therapist based in Manhattan. He is also an aspiring actor who frequents the gym and relies on NPR for his news updates. He disclosed to the court that his sister experienced domestic abuse from her ex-husband many years ago; however, he maintains that he can remain unbiased. Despite believing that Combs might have some involvement in the allegations he has heard, he assured the judge that his opinions would solely be based on the evidence presented in the courtroom. Prosecutors preferred to keep him on the jury, while the defense sought to have him dismissed.

Juror 5 is a 31-year-old white man from Manhattan who works in finance and recently married in November. He is a member of a country club in Connecticut and acknowledged having seen the CNN video depicting the alleged beating involving Cassie. Additionally, he mentioned his stance against capital punishment, which may affect his perspective throughout the trial.

Juror 25 is a 51-year-old gay man who shares a home with his boyfriend. He has an educational background in veterinary medicine and holds a Ph.D. in molecular biology, showcasing a high level of academic achievement that may influence his analytical skills in evaluating the evidence presented during the trial.

Juror 28 is a 30-year-old woman from the Bronx who lives with her mother. She revealed that her mother once worked at a bank and was involved in some financial misconduct, having stolen money from it. Currently working as a deli clerk, she primarily uses Facebook and TikTok to get her news updates, which indicates her reliance on social media platforms for information.

Juror 55 is a 42-year-old woman employed at a nursing home, where her husband also works. Their son is employed at Bellevue Hospital, showcasing a family deeply embedded in the healthcare industry. During the proceedings, she humorously recounted a past incident where she received a ticket for possessing an open container of alcohol in public, which drew laughter from the judge and courtroom attendants last week.

Juror 58 is a 41-year-old Hispanic man residing in the Bronx, where he works as an accountant for the Department of Corrections. His role involves processing payroll for correctional officers. He has previously sued the Port Authority after sustaining an injury on an escalator, eventually settling the case. Furthermore, he has faced legal trouble related to insurance fraud stemming from a car accident, for which he pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge.

Juror 75 is a 68-year-old Indian American retired businessman who previously worked at JPMorgan Chase. He stays informed by consuming news from various outlets, including CNN, Fox News, and the New York Times, indicating a broad media consumption that may influence his perspectives during the trial.

Juror 116 is a married 68-year-old white man who worked as a retired telecommunications field technician. He receives news primarily from 1010 WINS, an all-news radio station in NYC. Notably, both of his adult children are employed by municipal governments in New York City, which may contribute to his understanding of public service and governance. He has also seen the Cassie beating video, which could influence his perceptions of the case.

Juror 160 is a Black woman employed at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, where she works closely with teenagers in Harlem. She has prior experience assisting her ex-boyfriend in filing legal documents in a child support case, which may provide her with a unique perspective on legal proceedings.

Juror 184 is a 39-year-old Black man who lives with his brother in the Bronx. He serves as a security guard for a social services organization in NYC and also works as a social worker for the Jewish Child Care Association, where he specializes in child neglect cases. His professional background may influence his understanding of the social implications of the trial.

Juror 201 is a single man residing in Westchester, where he is employed at a bank. He has prior experience serving on a jury in the Bronx, which may provide him with insights into the legal process and jury dynamics.

Juror 217 is an older Black woman without children who keeps herself informed through CBS and ABC news channels. Her life experience may contribute to her judgment and perspective during the trial.

Juror 230 is a 57-year-old white man residing in Westchester who works as an architect. He expressed that he does not follow celebrity news closely; however, he has heard allegations regarding Diddy’s involvement with underage women and prostitution. This knowledge could potentially bias his view of the case.

Juror 234 is a 34-year-old Black man from Manhattan who mentioned he had heard in the news about allegations of Diddy being involved in sex trafficking. This knowledge may influence how he perceives the evidence presented during the trial.

Juror 247 is a 40-year-old white man living in Manhattan, who is employed at a medical school specializing in oncology. He and his artist wife do not have children, which may shape their perspectives on family-related issues discussed during the trial.

Juror 292 is a 71-year-old white woman employed as an archivist. She refrains from using social media, opting instead to obtain news from reputable sources like the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, New Yorker, and WIRED Magazine. Her sister is a clinical psychologist who works with transgender youth, which may influence her views on social issues.

Juror 321 is a 24-year-old Black woman from the Bronx who lives independently. She works for a coffee company and has seen the Cassie video, but she informed the court that she believes she can remain fair, emphasizing that there are always two sides to every story. She is married to a West African husband who resides outside the U.S., which may contribute to her diverse perspective on cultural matters.

Juror 330 is a 37-year-old white man who works at the United Nations as an operations manager in the office of counter-terrorism, collaborating closely with the U.S. State Department. His office is currently facing budget cuts. He has expressed awareness of the charges in this case and has indicated that he is “not pro-prostitution.” His news consumption includes the New York Times and Fox News, although he explicitly mentioned that he does not follow “TMZ-type news,” which may suggest a critical approach to sensationalist media.

Diddy faces a total of five federal charges: two counts of sex trafficking, two counts of transportation for prostitution, and one count of racketeering conspiracy. He has entered a plea of not guilty to all charges, setting the stage for a contentious legal battle.