In a shocking turn of events, Britani Bateman, a prominent figure from the Real Housewives of Salt Lake City, is facing serious allegations regarding a substantial debt of 0,000 owed to her former mother-in-law, Sandra Underwood. This accusation has cast a shadow over Bateman’s reputation, as her ex-husband’s mother claims that the funds were misappropriated for her personal use.

According to legal documents obtained by Page Six on Monday, Sandra Underwood, the mother of Bateman’s ex-husband John Scott Underwood, asserts that the reality star failed to repay the money. The lawsuit, filed on May 6, contends that Bateman, aged 53, took the funds that had been intended for a family trust and utilized them for her own personal benefit, thus breaching the trust placed in her.

The legal complaint explicitly states, “Britani willfully, maliciously and through deliberately fraudulent conduct, also converted Plaintiff’s funds and now refuses to repay the funds.” The document further claims that Bateman has been “unjustly enriched” by this alleged behavior, suggesting a serious breach of trust and ethical standards.

In March, Sandra‘s attorney reached out to Bateman with a formal request for the return of the $100,000. However, Sandra has alleged in her filing that, “so far [she has] I have not yet received the return of my money.” This lack of response has prompted the legal action, highlighting the urgency of the matter.

According to the included documentation, Sandra received a total of $338,889.31 after selling her home in West Valley, Utah. This transaction seems to be a pivotal part of the case, as it outlines the source of the funds in question and casts further light on the financial dynamics between the parties involved.

Shortly thereafter, and reportedly “on the urging of Britani,” Sandra opted to deposit $100,000 into the family trust with the clear understanding that she could request a withdrawal at any time. This arrangement was made with the expectation that the funds would be returned without any objections, maintaining the trust’s integrity.

Established in 2019, the trust known as the Integrity Trust was created by Bateman’s father, Melvin Merrill Martin, who served as the settlor. Bateman and her late mother, Cathie, were designated as trustees. Following Cathie’s passing, John was appointed as the successor trustee, a role that now brings additional scrutiny to the situation.

The letter from Sandra’s attorney emphasizes that, “As Britani knows, Sandra is in her 80s and as she has aged, her cost of living has increased, largely due to health issues that many elderly individuals face.” This statement underscores the financial strain and urgency of Sandra’s situation, as her limited income becomes a focal point in the ongoing legal dispute.

Legal representatives have pointed out that Sandra’s “limited income” of approximately $1,600 monthly is insufficient to meet her medical expenses and prescription needs. This financial reality adds a layer of complexity to the case, as it highlights the potential consequences of Bateman’s alleged actions on Sandra’s well-being.

In her legal claim, John’s mother is requesting that Bateman, “out of simple decency and morality,” return the $100,000, “plus interest at the statutory rate prescribed by law” and cover any associated attorney fees incurred due to this legal action. This demand reflects not only a legal obligation but also an appeal to Bateman’s sense of duty and family responsibility.

The legal entanglements between Bateman and her ex-husband, who finalized their divorce in October 2023 after a marriage lasting seven years, have been tumultuous. The complexities of their relationship have now spilled over into the courtroom, further complicating their post-divorce dynamics.

Previously, the reality star accused John of becoming “very controlling and abusive” during their marriage, making serious allegations that led to a $2.5 million lawsuit filed last October, as reported by the Daily Mail. She claimed that he demanded excessive intimacy and control over her personal life, raising significant concerns about their relationship.

In the months that followed, Bateman alleged that John drained their joint checking account and excluded her from their shared business ventures, which has now contributed to the ongoing legal disputes. This series of events has undoubtedly strained their relationship, leading to heightened tensions as they navigate the aftermath of their marriage.

As of now, Bateman has not responded to Page Six’s request for comment regarding these serious allegations and the ongoing legal battle.