Mustard’s Public Image Faces Scrutiny Amid Ex-Wife’s Social Media Attacks ? The private life of popular music producer Mustard has taken a tumultuous turn as he claims that his ex-wife, Chanel Thierry, is openly criticizing him online. Despite their mutual agreement to maintain respect for each other in public discourse, Mustard alleges that she has broken this pact, leading him to seek a formal retraction of her statements. This situation not only raises questions about their personal relationship but also about the implications it may have on their family dynamics and public perception.

Legal documents obtained by TMZ reveal that Samantha Spector, Mustard’s divorce attorney, asserts that Chanel Thierry is not only breaching the court’s directive to refrain from negative public statements but is actively undermining the spirit of their agreement. This legal contention highlights the complexities often involved in high-profile divorces, where personal grievances can spill over into the public arena, affecting reputations and potentially influencing custody arrangements concerning their children.

In a troubling allegation, Mustard asserts that Chanel has attempted to portray him as a negligent parent. She allegedly claimed that a significant payment of $275,000 he made as part of their divorce settlement was earmarked solely for back child support, a statement he vehemently disputes. This characterization not only undermines his role as a father but also raises critical issues regarding the public’s perception of his parenting capabilities and responsibilities.

Mustard contends that the $275,000 payment was not only for back child support but also aimed at offsetting the value of luxury vehicles he retained after their separation. He firmly believes that this financial arrangement reflects his commitment to their children’s well-being rather than the negative portrayal that Chanel has suggested. This dispute exemplifies the often contentious nature of divorce settlements, where financial issues can become entangled with personal grievances, impacting public perception and family dynamics.

Furthermore, Mustard claims that Chanel has breached their privacy by disclosing sensitive information regarding his medical history. He alleges that she made public statements suggesting he falsely claimed to have cancer, which not only invades his privacy but also poses significant emotional distress. This accusation raises critical ethical questions about the boundaries of personal information in public discourse, especially concerning mental and physical health.

Mustard has described Chanel’s public commentary regarding his medical issues as profoundly inappropriate and damaging, stating that her actions are “beyond the pale.” This assertion underscores the emotional turmoil he is experiencing as a result of their public feud, reflecting how personal disputes can escalate into broader public controversies, affecting not only the individuals involved but also their families.

In a further twist, Mustard suggests that Chanel’s reference to a “Gemini narc” in her social media posts was a direct jab at him, owing to his zodiac sign. He interprets her words as a pointed attack, demonstrating how personal relationships can intertwine with astrological beliefs, further complicating the public narrative surrounding their separation. This perception of targeted messaging adds another layer of complexity to their already strained relationship.

Mustard reports that while Chanel eventually consented to remove her controversial posts, he believes that the harm inflicted on his reputation was already substantial, necessitating a public retraction of her statements. He emphasizes that her actions constitute harassment and have serious implications for their family’s dynamics, especially concerning their three children. This situation highlights the potential long-lasting effects of public disputes on familial relationships and personal reputations.