Clayton Howard, a male escort who prosecutors allege was employed by Diddy, is taking legal action against both Diddy and Cassie. He accuses Cassie of transmitting a sexually transmitted disease to him and claims she underwent an abortion after he allegedly impregnated her. This serious allegation brings forth critical discussions about sexual health and responsibility in intimate relationships.
In a recent lawsuit obtained by TMZ, Howard, who reportedly went by the alias “Dave” during his encounters with Diddy and Cassie, has made shocking claims. He details the circumstances surrounding his employment and the nature of his interactions with the celebrity couple, shedding light on the darker side of fame and the consequences of high-profile relationships.
The allegations made by Howard are serious; he claims to have contracted an STD as a result of sexual encounters with Cassie. Furthermore, he asserts that after he made her pregnant, she chose to terminate the pregnancy without informing him. In his account, he alleges that she continued to engage in unprotected sexual activities with him, raising significant questions about consent and communication in intimate relationships.
Howard is identified as one of seven male escorts involved in a federal case against Diddy. Prosecutors claim that these individuals were transported across state lines for the purpose of engaging in prostitution, highlighting the serious legal implications surrounding trafficking and exploitation in the sex industry.

According to Howard, his association with Diddy and Cassie began in 2009. He claims that for over five years, he was trafficked for the purpose of commercial sex, serving as entertainment to fulfill their sexual desires and personal fantasies. This raises significant concerns regarding the ethics of hiring escorts and the impact it may have on vulnerable individuals in the industry.
Howard alleges that during his time with Diddy and Cassie, he was subjected to drugging, manipulation, and trauma. He describes their relationship as toxic and marked by domestic violence, which often escalated into physical confrontations. These allegations draw attention to the serious consequences of abusive relationships and the need for support systems for those affected.
2 Offended Males Podcast
He further claims that Cassie coerced him into taking ecstasy and engaging in unprotected sexual activities. Additionally, he alleges that she would command him to masturbate for prolonged periods, which caused him severe physical discomfort, including skin peeling and scabbing on his penis. These allegations illustrate broader issues of consent and the psychological impact of manipulation in sexual relationships.
Howard asserts that his experiences with Diddy and Cassie resulted in significant physical and mental health issues, lost income, mounting medical bills, and prolonged emotional distress. He emphasizes that the trauma inflicted has severely diminished his quality of life, raising critical discussions about the long-term effects of exploitation in the entertainment industry.
TMZ.com
Although Howard was not formally called as a witness, he was referenced multiple times during Diddy’s trial. Testimonies from federal agents included details about Clayton’s stay at a Four Seasons hotel and a flight arranged from NYC to LA, both allegedly financed by Diddy. This raises questions about the extent of Diddy’s involvement and the implications for those associated with him.
Diddy faced serious charges but was acquitted of racketeering and sex trafficking. However, he was found guilty of transporting escorts across state lines for the purpose of prostitution. Following the verdict, he was denied bail and remains in custody, facing the possibility of up to 20 years in prison. This verdict highlights the ongoing issues of accountability and justice in cases involving high-profile individuals.
TMZ.com
We have reached out to the legal representatives of Diddy and Cassie for their comments regarding these serious allegations. As of now, we have not received any response from them, which raises questions about the potential implications and future developments in this high-profile case.

Here you can find the original article; the photos and images used in our article also come from this source. We are not their authors; they have been used solely for informational purposes with proper attribution to their original source.






