The Ohio State Buckeyes decisively defeated the Tennessee Volunteers during the College Football Playoff on Saturday night, showcasing their dominance on the field. The game drew significant attention, and one commentator from ESPN presented a unique perspective that added to the excitement of the event.

In a captivating twist, ESPN aired an alternative version of the playoff game on ESPN 2, featuring the dynamic cast of ?The Pat McAfee Show.? This program is renowned for its entertaining and often humorous takes on sports, led by McAfee and his team, who are celebrated for their engaging commentary and occasionally controversial remarks that resonate with fans.

During the second quarter, the atmosphere was electric, and McAfee turned to his right-hand man, Boston Connor, to gauge the reactions of Tennessee fans as they found themselves trailing 21-0. This moment highlighted the playful banter that characterizes McAfee’s broadcasts, providing fans with a unique lens into the game.

Connor was on the sidelines for Tennessee and made a bold statement, referencing an Ohio State super-fan known as ?Big Nut.? He humorously claimed that Big Nut was ?busting his nut? in the faces of the Volunteers supporters, a remark that certainly caught the attention of viewers and added a layer of humor to the broadcast.

The unexpected quip from Connor left some commentators momentarily speechless, with audible reactions like, ?Ey yo,? highlighting the surprising nature of the comment during a competitive sports broadcast.

In response to the raunchy comment, McAfee took the opportunity to add his own flair to the discussion, saying, ?Yeah, anytime a nut goes wild, things get crazy.? This remark encapsulates the playful and often irreverent tone of their broadcast, which appeals to a specific audience segment.

Some viewers expressed shock and outrage over the off-color remark, quickly taking to X to voice their displeasure. This reaction highlights the different expectations audiences have for sports commentary and the boundaries of humor in such settings.

One viewer commented, ?This is family time smh we need to bring back professionalism because what is this!???? Another chimed in, ?Pat only speaks to the lowest common denominator, and if you don?t understand what that means, I?m probably talking about you. It?s unfortunate ESPN puts him out there to attract this demographic, as crude as it may be.? These comments reflect a broader debate about the tone of sports commentary and its impact on audiences.