Emotional Testimony: Sean “Diddy” Combs’ Ex Reveals Distress After Reading Cassie Ventura’s Lawsuit
In a shocking revelation during her testimony, Jane disclosed that she experienced a profound emotional reaction after engaging with portions of Cassie Ventura’s lawsuit filed in November 2023. This legal case, which ultimately reached a settlement, included elements that resonated deeply with Jane’s own troubling experiences involving Sean “Diddy” Combs.
“I almost fainted, in fact, I think I did,” Jane recounted to the jurors, her voice trembling with emotion. “There were three specific pages that referenced my experiences in a harrowing manner.”
Reflecting on her past, Jane, who participated in the so-called “hotel nights,” emphasized that reading the lawsuit felt eerily similar to reliving her own traumatic narrative. This revelation prompted her to confront Combs through a series of text messages, seeking clarity and acknowledgment of her pain.
“I feel like I am reading my own sexual trauma,” Jane expressed in her messages following the lawsuit’s publication, as shown in the evidence presented. “I am sick. It’s exactly word for word, detailing the drug-filled days and nights. You knew this was coming. You gaslit me, you made me feel like I was losing my mind.”
“I am disgusted. I felt forced to perform continuously,” she continued in her messages. “You made me feel insane about the sexual trauma I was experiencing. I feel deeply violated. This was a clear case of sexual exploitation.”
In a turn of events, Combs later contacted Jane and recorded their conversation without her consent, which was subsequently entered into evidence. During this call, he stated that they “did these things together” and emphasized that “this is when” he needed her “to be there.”
Unaware of the recording, Jane candidly expressed her distress to Combs, revealing that she felt “sick” to her stomach after absorbing the contents of Ventura’s legal documents.
You can find the original article here; the photos and images used in our article also come from this source. We are not their authors; they have been used solely for informational purposes with proper attribution to their original source.