Soulja Boy Faces Legal Consequences
Found Liable for Sexual Assault in Significant Lawsuit
Ordered to Pay Millions in Damages!
Published April 10, 2025, at 1:10 PM PDT
The well-known rapper Soulja Boy is facing a significant financial burden after a jury in Los Angeles determined that he is liable in a sexual assault lawsuit brought forth by his former personal assistant. This ruling marks a pivotal moment in the legal proceedings, compelling the artist to confront the ramifications of his actions. With the jury’s decision, it is evident that the allegations against him were taken seriously, and the financial consequences will likely impact his future endeavors.
The verdict was delivered on a Thursday in a Los Angeles courtroom, where the judge explicitly stated that the rapper, famous for his hit “Crank Dat,” is responsible for paying millions of dollars in damages. The jury is also reportedly deliberating on the possibility of imposing punitive damages, which could significantly increase the financial repercussions for Soulja Boy, further emphasizing the seriousness of the case.
The jury found the rapper liable for multiple serious offenses, including assault, sexual battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Each of these claims reflects the severity of the accusations against him and serves as a cautionary tale for others in the industry regarding the treatment of employees and the consequences of inappropriate behavior.

As a result of the jury’s findings, Soulja Boy is being ordered to pay a total of $1.5 million in damages specifically for the sexual battery claim. Additionally, the amount of $1.325 million has been added for the intentional infliction of emotional distress, showcasing the court’s acknowledgment of the psychological impact on the victim.
The plaintiff, who has chosen to remain anonymous and is referred to as Jane Doe, sought an astounding $73.5 million in damages. This figure reflects the gravity of the treatment she alleges she endured while working closely with Soulja Boy from 2019 to 2020. The case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of accountability and the potential consequences of one’s actions in the public eye.